The tax benefit for R&D&I in Corporation Tax (IS) consists of the possibility of deducting 25% of expenditure on research and development (R&D) and 12% of expenditure on technological innovation (TI) from the tax liability, subject to certain maximum limits.
Tax benefits
Spending review 2018–2021. Phase II
- Published: January, 2026
- Amount: 35.000 mill. €
Scope: General State Administration
Spending policies evaluated
Research, development, innovation and digitalisation
Social services and social advancement
Financial and tax administration
Health
Education
Promotion of employment
Pensions
Access to housing and promotion of building
Environment
Agriculture, fisheries and food
Industry and energy
Public transport
Trade, tourism and small and medium-sized enterprises
Culture
Other financial benefits
Tools evaluated
-
244 mill. €
IS. Tax relief for R&D&I incentives See information aboutIS. Tax relief for R&D&I incentives
IS. Tax relief for R&D&I incentives
-
469 mill. €
Personal income tax. Donation deduction See information aboutPersonal income tax. Donation deduction
Personal income tax. Donation deduction
75% of the donation for the first €150 and 30% for the rest.
-
2.777 mill. €
VAT. Exemption for financial services See information aboutVAT. Exemption for financial services
VAT. Exemption for financial services
Possibility of not taxing financial services
-
107 mill. €
IS. Deduction for donations See information aboutIS. Deduction for donations
IS. Deduction for donations
35% of the donation with a limit.
-
3.457 mill. €
VAT. Exemption for health and education See information aboutVAT. Exemption for health and education
VAT. Exemption for health and education
Possibility of not levying VAT on private education and healthcare.
-
1.708 mill. €
Personal income tax. Social deductions (maternity, large families, disability) See information aboutPersonal income tax. Social deductions (maternity, large families, disability)
Personal income tax. Social deductions (maternity, large families, disability)
Negative tax of up to €1,200 for mothers with children under 3 years of age, large families and taxpayers with dependent persons with disabilities.
-
34.248 mill. €
Tax benefits (personal income tax, VAT, and special tax on financial transactions, corporation tax) See information aboutTax benefits (personal income tax, VAT, and special tax on financial transactions, corporation tax)
Tax benefits (personal income tax, VAT, and special tax on financial transactions, corporation tax)
Tax benefits in 2016 assessed:
- (Personal income tax: reduction for joint taxation, reduction for contributions to social security systems, reduction for employment income, reduction for housing rentals, deduction for donations, social deductions (maternity, disability, large families)
- VAT and IIEE for households: reduced rates: 4% and 10%, exemption for education and healthcare, exemption for financial services, reduced rates for hydrocarbons
- IS: Reduced rates (SICAV and SOCIMI), deduction for donations, deduction for investment in R&D&I
-
2.393 mill. €
Personal income tax. Reduction for joint taxation: married couples See information aboutPersonal income tax. Reduction for joint taxation: married couples
Personal income tax. Reduction for joint taxation: married couples
€3,400 for married couples who choose to file a single tax return.
-
1.643 mill. €
Personal income tax. Contributions to social welfare systems See information aboutPersonal income tax. Contributions to social welfare systems
Personal income tax. Contributions to social welfare systems
Up to €8,000 for contributions to pension plans (tax deferral)
-
1.139 mill. €
IRPF. Reduction for income from work See information aboutIRPF. Reduction for income from work
IRPF. Reduction for income from work
Up to €5,565 for income from employment for taxpayers with employment income of less than €16,825.
-
1.039 mill. €
Personal income tax. Reduction for renting a home See information aboutPersonal income tax. Reduction for renting a home
Personal income tax. Reduction for renting a home
60% of the net income obtained from renting out your primary residence.
-
17.787 mill. €
VAT. Reduced rates See information aboutVAT. Reduced rates
VAT. Reduced rates
Tax rates lower than the general rate (21%) on the consumption of essential goods and services or those that are social, cultural or strategic in nature.
-
323 mill. €
IS. Reduced rates for SICAVs and SOCIMIs See information aboutIS. Reduced rates for SICAVs and SOCIMIs
IS. Reduced rates for SICAVs and SOCIMIs
Reduced tax rates of 1% and 0% respectively on corporation tax.
STUDY DESCRIPTION
- What is being evaluated? Tax benefits are fiscal policy instruments that pursue certain economic and social objectives through exemptions, reduced rates, reductions or deductions in tax payments that generate incentives or improvements in the income of individuals and legal entities, which generally lead to lower tax revenues.
- Objective: To evaluate some of these tax benefits in order to determine whether they fulfil the objectives for which they were created and to detect whether their existence is associated with any type of externality or distortion that would make it advisable to reformulate them. The study does not discuss the relevance or suitability of the economic policy objectives pursued by each tax benefit.
- Scope, amount and time horizon: This study evaluates 13 tax benefits, with a total cost of approximately €35 billion in 2016 (the year in which the tax information was finalised at the time of this study), representing 60% of the total tax cost of all existing tax benefits.
- Methodology and data: Elasticity estimation methodologies are combined with quasi-experimental counterfactual econometric impact analyses such as Diff-in-Diff, regression discontinuity and the development of fiscal microsimulators. To identify the findings, microdata from the universe of personal income tax returns, corporate tax returns and the family budget survey (EPF) for VAT are used in both cross-sectional and panel formats provided by the tax agency for the development of this assessment. In addition, the data from the personal income tax universe has been merged with the household consumption data from the EPF.
Findings and proposals
The tax benefit for R+D+I shows a significant gap between the potential effectiveness of the tax benefit and its actual effectiveness
- Although the deduction percentages are high in international comparison, the maximum deduction limits play a limiting role, reducing the possibility of applying the deduction in full in each financial year, generating significant tax credits in the future and thus reducing the attractiveness of the incentive. For its part, the optional regime established in 2014 allows the limits to be exceeded or the deduction to be obtained in the form of a refundable deduction, but it has not proved as effective as expected, as a series of administrative requirements must be met for its application, which limit the attractiveness of this special regime.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, elasticity analysis, international benchmarking
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Allow application for refundable deduction under the optional scheme
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
The crisis caused by the war in Ukraine has meant that a comprehensive reform of corporate income tax has not been undertaken, with selective measures and improvements in the legal certainty of incentives being opted for instead, in particular by clarifying the compatibility of minimum taxation with the mechanism for monetising R&D&I deductions (or cash-back).
On the other hand, this same situation makes it inadvisable to eliminate the obligation to maintain a workforce in order to qualify for the optional regime under Article 39.2b of the Corporate Income Tax Law.
Allow the application for the refundable deduction under the optional regime in the same financial year in which the right to deduction arises (delete Article 39.2a of the Corporate Income Tax Law).
-
Elimination of the obligation to maintain the overall average workforce
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
The crisis caused by the war in Ukraine has meant that a comprehensive reform of corporate income tax has not been undertaken, with selective measures and improvements in the legal certainty of incentives being opted for instead, in particular by clarifying the compatibility of minimum taxation with the mechanism for monetising R&D&I deductions (or cash-back).
On the other hand, this same situation makes it inadvisable to eliminate the obligation to maintain a workforce in order to qualify for the optional regime under Article 39.2b of the Corporate Income Tax Law.
Eliminate the obligation to maintain the average workforce, or alternatively the workforce assigned to R&D&I activities, for 24 months in order to qualify for the optional regime (Article 39.2b of the LIS).
-
Elimination of certain requirements established in Article 39.2 of the LIS in order to qualify for the optional regime
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
The crisis caused by the war in Ukraine has meant that a comprehensive reform of corporate income tax has not been undertaken, with selective measures and improvements in the legal certainty of incentives being opted for instead, in particular by clarifying the compatibility of minimum taxation with the mechanism for monetising R&D&I deductions (or cash-back).
On the other hand, this same situation makes it inadvisable to eliminate the obligation to maintain a workforce in order to qualify for the optional regime under Article 39.2b of the Corporate Income Tax Law.
Eliminate some of the requirements established in Article 39.2 of the LIS in order to qualify for the optional regime and thus gradually bring the potential effectiveness closer to the actual effectiveness of the tax benefit and improve the attractiveness of the incentive among SMEs.
Inconclusive evidence of VAT exemptions for health and education services
NOT CONCLUSIVE. If the exemption were lifted, the increased revenue obtained by the State in VAT could be offset by a higher cost of providing the service through the public system. The result is subject to the heterogeneous range of elasticities found in the estimate.
Methodologies: international benchmarking, descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
There are no associated proposals.
Social deductions (maternity, large families, disability) have a small but significant positive effect.
A small but significant positive effect on both the birth rate and the labour force participation of women with children under the age of 3.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, international benchmarking, microsimulators
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
There are no associated proposals.
No direct causal relationship has been identified between the tax deduction for donations and the increase in donations.
NOT CONCLUSIVE: no direct causal relationship has been identified between the tax benefit and the recent increase in donations, although analysis based on European surveys shows that the tax incentive is one of the five main factors that positively influence the decision to make donations.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators, conditional descriptive statistical analysis
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
There are no associated proposals.
No causal relationship has been identified between the tax benefit of deducting corporate income tax donations and the increase in donations.
NOT CONCLUSIVE: no direct causal relationship has been identified between the tax benefit and the recent increase in donations, although analysis based on European surveys shows that the tax incentive is one of the five main factors that positively influence the decision to make donations.
Methodologies: international benchmarking, descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
There are no associated proposals.
VAT exemption for financial services reduces the cost of financing for households and businesses
Lifting the exemption would increase prices as a result of the higher tax burden on financial products for households, and would not affect businesses as they can deduct the VAT they pay.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, international benchmarking
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
There are no associated proposals.
The R+D+I tax credit does encourage investment in R+D+I, but there is room for improvement.
The evaluation concludes that the tax benefit does achieve the objective of promoting investment in R&D&I, which increases by €1.5 for every euro that the administration allocates to the tax incentive. This result is in line with those found in the most recent literature, which range between €1 and €1.5 for every euro of tax benefit. Thus, Guceri and Liu (2019) find a return of approximately one pound for every pound of lost revenue in the United Kingdom, rising to one and a half pounds in the case of small businesses. For its part, the OECD (2020) also finds a response close to one, being somewhat lower for large companies. Furthermore, according to the estimates in this study, a one percentage point increase in the deduction (e.g. from 25% to 26%) would increase companies’ R&D&I expenditure by approximately €110 million, representing an increase in the cost of the tax benefit to the state of €73 million (approximately). Of this amount, £36 million would become tax credit and only £37 million would be deducted in the same tax period.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, elasticity analysis, international benchmarking
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Establish a faster, semi-automated accreditation mechanism for low investments
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
On 26 September 2022, an agreement was signed between the Tax Agency and MICIN for the evaluation of R&D&I projects related to the application of corporate income tax incentives, which establishes a stable framework that 11 BOE-A-2022-18991 Resolution of 10 November 2022, of the Undersecretary, publishing the Agreement between the State Tax Administration Agency and the Ministry of Science and Innovation, allows the tax enforcement bodies to obtain a reasoned report from MICIN regarding the taxpayer’s compliance with the scientific and technological requirements necessary to apply the incentives provided for in corporate income tax to R&D&I activities.
Establish a rapid, semi-automatic R&D&I accreditation mechanism for companies whose R&D&I investment does not exceed a certain limit.
-
Improve transparency, increase the information required and analyse the tax benefit within a comprehensive policy to support R&D&I.
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2024 (Report):
Law 19/2013, of 9 December, on transparency, access to public information and good governance, imposed the mandatory disclosure of subsidies and other public aid.
Furthermore, any aid that is considered state aid for the purposes of European Union law, in accordance with the provisions of Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and its implementing rules, must be published in the National Subsidy Database.
Therefore, Royal Decree 130/20198, which regulates the National Subsidy Database and the disclosure of subsidies and other public aid, limits the registration of tax benefits that are considered state aid because they involve a selective economic advantage to those that exceed the minimum thresholds required by EU rules.
The deduction for research and development and technological innovation activities (tax incentive for R&D&I) is not considered state aid, and therefore the proposal must be rejected as it does not fall within the cases that determine the publicity of tax benefits.
In addition, Article 95 of Law 58/2003 of 17 December, the General Tax Law, establishes the confidential nature of data with tax implications and the impossibility of transferring or communicating it to third parties. This regime of confidentiality of tax data constitutes a right of taxpayers (Article 34.1.i) of the General Tax Law) and the tax authorities have a duty to guarantee it, as provided for in Article 95(3) of the LGT, which would prevent the recommendation from being implemented.
Publish the list of legal entities benefiting from the tax incentive to bring their publicity into line with that required in programmes for direct transfers and subsidies to R&D&I, thereby improving transparency.
Increase the information requirements on the characteristics, composition of R&D&I expenditure and innovation results of beneficiary companies in order to better assess the effectiveness of the tax incentive. In particular, more information would be requested on the details of general R&D&I expenditure (beyond that subject to deduction), socio-economic characteristics and the financial situation of companies. Likewise, information on innovation results (patents, industrial design, etc.) should be included.
Analyse the tax benefit in conjunction with direct transfer and subsidy policies within the overall policy of support for R&D&I.
Lack of coordination with the expenditure department affected by the tax benefit
Tax benefits are one of the instruments available for achieving certain economic policy objectives, so it would be appropriate to frame their assessment within the set of measures aimed at achieving those objectives. In particular, when drawing up recommendations, it is important to take into account the other measures in place at both national and regional level and to assess whether these benefits are the most appropriate instrument for achieving a specific objective.
Methodologies: documentary analysis
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Comprehensive planning of public expenditure with ex ante and ex post evaluations
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2022 (Report):
Tax measures, such as those relating to tax benefits, which affect a particular sector, must always be adopted in accordance with this principle. With regard to these recommendations, it should be noted that any articulation of tax benefits is integrated into the strategic planning of the public policies to which it relates. Likewise, such planning includes forecasts of the effects that their implementation may have. An example of this is the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, which comprehensively covers measures and reforms in terms of both public revenue and expenditure and regulation.
Furthermore, the economic report on the respective modifications includes the estimated economic impact of the same, provided that such a calculation is possible.
With regard to ex-post evaluations, it is worth mentioning that, within the scope of Component 28 of the PRTR, a working group has been set up between the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT) and the Directorate-General for Taxation, which is analysing 15 tax benefits.
In the subsequent update of December 2022 (Annex):
Tax measures, such as those relating to tax benefits, which affect a particular sector, must always be adopted in accordance with this principle. With regard to these recommendations, it should be noted that any articulation of tax benefits is integrated into the strategic planning of the public policies to which it relates. Likewise, such planning includes forecasts of the effects that their implementation may have. An example of this is the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan, which comprehensively covers measures and reforms in terms of both public revenue and expenditure and regulation.
Furthermore, the economic report on the respective modifications includes the estimated economic impact of the same, provided that such a calculation is possible.
With regard to ex-post evaluations, it should be mentioned that within the scope of Component 28 of the PRTR, a working group has been set up between the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT) and the Directorate-General for Taxation, which is analysing 15 tax benefits.
The strategic planning of the public policies to which the respective tax benefits relate is the responsibility of the relevant ministerial departments, which define the necessary protocols and analyse possible alternatives, such as direct aid via expenditure policies.
The classification by spending policies is set out in the General State Budget Law for 2022.
An example of the estimated ex ante impact of new tax benefits adopted is included in the 2022 Budget Plan, which details the measures adopted that have an impact on tax benefits, estimating their budgetary impact for 2021 and 2022.
With regard to ex post evaluations, the aforementioned working group published the first part of its analysis last March, with a study of five tax benefits:
– Adjustments to the tax base on income from certain intangible assets (corporate income tax).
– Special tax regime applicable to non-profit organisations (IS).
– Partial exemption from the special tax on certain lottery and betting prizes (IRPF).
– Exemption from income tax on earnings obtained abroad (IRPF).
– Special tax on coal (IC).
https://www.hacienda.gob.es/Documentacion/Publico/GabineteMinistro/Varios/31-03-22-Informe-Revision-Beneficios-Fiscales-2021.pdf
The creation or any modification of tax benefits must be framed within the strategic planning of the public policies to which they relate, so that the effectiveness of the different instruments can be assessed as a whole and the efficiency of different alternatives for achieving the proposed objective can be compared.
The formulation and reform of tax benefits, like other spending policies, must be accompanied by ex ante evaluations to determine the potential effects of the measures before they are adopted, and ex post evaluations after a few years to measure the degree to which the objectives have been met and, where possible, the efficiency with which they have been achieved.
-
Administrative coordination
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2022 (Report):
The Ministry indicates that this recommendation has been implemented through the reactivation of the Working Group with autonomous communities, within the Fiscal and Financial Policy Council, created to agree on the methodology to be followed in compliance with Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on the requirements applicable to the budgetary frameworks of Member States, with regard to the tax benefits of the Autonomous Communities. Two meetings were held in 2021 (June and September), and another in February 2022.
In the subsequent update of December 2022 (Annex):
The Ministry indicates that this recommendation has been implemented through the reactivation of the Working Group with autonomous communities, within the Fiscal and Financial Policy Council, created to agree on the methodology to be followed in compliance with Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on the requirements applicable to Member States’ budgetary frameworks, with regard to the tax benefits of the autonomous communities. Two meetings were held in 2021 (June and September), and another in February 2022. The response of ‘proposal implemented’ refers to the fact that the working group is indeed active and that it is resulting in better coordination between the different levels of the administration, which is the recommendation made in the SR.
Although a formal document with the conclusions reached by this working group has not yet been drawn up, we can find an example of such coordination in the 2023 General State Budget Bill. This is, in the section on the estimated tax benefits for 2023, the adjustment to wealth tax due to the application of the joint limit with income tax: this has been the result of a joint study with the Autonomous Communities in the aforementioned Working Group, which concluded that this concept should no longer be considered a tax benefit, as it is a technical rule aimed at avoiding the confiscatory effect that could occur for taxpayers who have to pay both taxes.
Coordination between different levels of government must be improved, particularly with regard to tax benefits and other state and regional economic policy instruments that pursue similar objectives, in order to achieve maximum effectiveness and efficiency in meeting the general needs of the population as a whole and the specific needs of each territory.
Joint taxation fulfils its objective but discourages the second earner in the household from participating in the labour market.
The €3,400 reduction for joint taxation in the form of marriage achieves its objective of adjusting the tax to the composition of household income, particularly reducing the tax burden on families in which all income comes from a single member. However, its existence discourages the second income earner in the household (who is a woman in more than 80% of cases) from participating in the labour market, which exacerbates the gender gap problems in the Spanish economy.
Methodologies: descriptive statistical analysis, distributive analysis, regressions in discontinuity
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Disappearance of joint taxation
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
The crisis has led to the adoption of measures to support households in this area, particularly with regard to reducing gender bias, in the maternity deduction, extended in cases of receipt of contributory or welfare benefits from the unemployment protection system, or registration in the corresponding Social Security or mutual insurance scheme with a minimum period of 30 days of contributions (Law 31/2022, of 23 December, on the General State Budget for the year 2023).
Accelerate their gradual disappearance by establishing a transitional regime and offset the negative effect that the tax benefit will continue to have with new incentives for women’s labour participation that reduce the gender gap.
The reduction for contributions to social security systems fails to encourage long-term savings.
The reduction of up to €8,000 for taxpayers’ contributions to various social welfare systems does not achieve its objective of encouraging long-term savings as a supplement to the public pension system. In fact, the assessment shows that the tax incentive may be negative for a large group of savers, once the taxation of benefits at retirement, pension plan fees and the intertemporal preference rate are taken into account.
Methodologies: microsimulators, distributive analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, regressions in discontinuity, elasticity analysis
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Reformulation of the benefit in accordance with the Toledo Pact recommendations
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2022 (Report):
This proposal has been fulfilled by modifying the limits on the reduction in the tax base for contributions to social welfare systems.
In the subsequent update of December 2022 (Annex):
This proposal has been implemented by modifying the reduction limits on the tax base for contributions to social security systems.
FIRST. Article 51 of Law 35/2006, of 28 November, on Personal Income Tax and partially amending the laws on Corporation Tax, Non-Resident Income Tax and Wealth Tax, was amended with effect from 1 January 2021, by Article 62.1 of Law 11/2020, of 30 December, on the General State Budget for 2021. (https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2020-17339#a6-4)
This measure modified the reductions for contributions to social welfare systems in order to encourage companies to contribute to their employees’ savings, increasing the applicable combined limit from €8,000 to €10,000, although limiting individual contributions by taxpayers to €2,000.
Therefore, the reduction was limited for higher individual contributions, which were concentrated among the highest incomes (in 2017, only taxpayers with incomes above €50,000 made contributions above €2,000 on average, so the reduction was regressive: it particularly benefited the highest incomes).
SECOND. Article 51 of Law 35/2006 of 28 November on Personal Income Tax and partially amending the laws on Corporation Tax, Non-Resident Income Tax and Wealth Tax was amended again, with effect from 1 January 2022, by Article 59.1 of Law 22/2021, of 28 December. (https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2021-21653#a5-11)
With this amendment, the limit on individual contributions to taxpayers was reduced again, leaving it at €1,500, with the aim of continuing to improve the progressivity of the tax and promoting shared effort between workers and companies. In addition, it is expected that the limit may be increased not only through employer contributions, but also through employee contributions to the same social welfare instrument
, provided that these contributions are equal to or less than the respective employer contribution.
Completely reformulate the tax benefit for contributions to social welfare systems, in line with the recommendations agreed upon in the Toledo Pact on long-term supplementary savings.
The reduction for employment income manages to boost the labour supply (small but significant effect).
The €5,565 reduction for earned income does achieve its objective of promoting low-income employment, mainly through the extensive margin (number of people working) rather than the number of hours (intensive margin). Specifically, for every million euros of increase in the total amount of the reduction, the final revenue cost would be €710,000. Twenty-seven per cent of the mechanical cost of the measure would be offset by the increase in the tax bases of those who move from not working to working (extensive effect), and the remaining 2% by the increase in the hours worked by those who were initially working (intensive effect).
Methodologies: documentary analysis, international benchmarking, microsimulators, descriptive statistical analysis, elasticity analysis
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Harmonisation and coordination of incentives aimed at promoting labour supply
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
Through Article 59 of the 2023 General State Budget Law, with the aim of assisting the sector of the population most affected by the current economic situation, comprising workers, pensioners, the self-employed and families with lower incomes, the amount of the reduction for income from work and the threshold above which it is applicable have been increased.
Previously, this reduction was applicable to taxpayers with net income from work of less than 16,825 euros, provided that they had no income, excluding exempt income, other than that from work.
Previously, this reduction was applicable to taxpayers with net employment income of less than €16,825, provided that they had no income, excluding exempt income, other than employment income exceeding €6,500. For individuals with net employment income equal to or less than €13,115, the reduction was set at €5,565 per annum, decreasing linearly to 0 for those with net employment income between €13,115 and €16,825.
With the amendment, the amount of the reduction is increased to €6,498 per year. Thus, as the reduction decreases linearly, the maximum amount up to which they benefit from the reduction also increases to €19,747.5 (equivalent to approximately €21,000 gross salary, compared to €18,000 gross per annum under the previous regulation).
Harmonise and improve the coordination of all existing incentives that seek to promote labour supply alongside the reduction of labour income, avoiding overlaps and duplications and, in particular, with future employment incentives under the Minimum Living Income scheme.
The reduction for residential leasing promotes the supply of rental housing.
The 60% reduction in net rental income DOES achieve its objective of promoting the supply of rental housing, although it has not been possible to differentiate between new supply and rents emerging from the informal economy. In addition, the evaluation identifies the growing difficulty for low-income households to access housing, especially in large metropolitan areas.
Methodologies: documentary analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, international benchmarking, microsimulators, difference in differences
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Targeting incentives to facilitate renting for vulnerable groups
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2024 (Report):
The second final provision of Law 12/2023, of 24 May, on the right to housing, includes a series of tax incentives applicable to personal income tax (IRPF) on the rental of properties intended for housing.
In particular, the previous 60 per cent reduction in the net income from residential rentals is modified, establishing a modulation of the same, with the aim of stimulating the rental of primary residences at affordable prices. Thus, the percentage reduction will vary depending on the situation:
- It will be 90 per cent in the case of new residential rental contracts signed in areas with a tight residential market, with a reduction of at least 5 per cent on the previous contract. It will be 70 per cent in the case of the incorporation into the market of housing intended for rental in areas with a tight residential market and rented to young people between the ages of 18 and 35 in those areas, or in the case of subsidised or protected affordable housing, rented to the public administration or third sector or social economy entities that are non-profit organisations, or covered by a public housing programme that limits the rental income.
- A reduction of 60 per cent on net income may be achieved when renovation work has been carried out in the previous two years.
- In any other case, the reduction will be 50 per cent.
Link to the approved regulation: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2023-12203#df-2
Reformulation of the incentive for reducing housing rental costs, reorienting its design to facilitate access to rental housing for vulnerable groups, taking into account the special needs in metropolitan areas. For example, by modulating the intensity of the incentive based on the housing rental index per census section of the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda or registration as social rental housing.
Reduced VAT rates facilitate access to basic necessities, but not in an efficient manner from a distributional point of view.
Lower taxation on certain goods and services through reduced VAT rates does facilitate access to essential, social, cultural or strategic goods and services and reduces the regressivity of the tax, although it does not achieve the objective efficiently from a distributional point of view.
Reduced rates, by lowering consumption taxes, benefit high incomes, which spend the most, to a greater extent. This effect is accentuated in those items of expenditure at reduced rates that are most consumed by high-income households (restaurants, package holidays, hotels, books, gardening, etc.), in which €5 billion in VAT revenue is lost.
In addition, the assessment highlights the distributive inefficiency when comparing reduced rates with other spending policies that are more focused on specific groups or sectors and that manage to reduce inequality much more than reduced rates while using fewer public resources.
Finally, the existence of a high proportion of expenditure at reduced rates explains Spain’s lower VAT revenue compared to our European partners.
Methodologies: international benchmarking, descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators, elasticity analysis, regressions in discontinuity
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Improving distributive efficiency with a review in step with economic recovery
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
The reduced rate for beverages with added sugars or sweeteners has been excluded.
The review of reduced rates has been influenced by the economic crisis caused by the pandemic, leading to the adoption of measures consisting of reduced rates for certain goods necessary to combat the health crisis.
More recently, measures have been aimed at mitigating the effects of rising energy prices, such as the application of a 5 per cent rate to gas and electricity. This rate has been extended to 2023 by Royal Decree Law 20/2022, which has introduced a significant change for this year. This is the application of a 0 per cent rate to basic foodstuffs — bread, flour, milk, cheese, eggs, fruit and vegetables — and a 5 per cent rate to oil and pasta.
The aim is to help the most vulnerable families and reduce inflation, with a temporary measure planned for the period between 1 January and 30 June 2023.
Gradual review, in step with economic recovery, of reduced VAT rates to improve the distributive efficiency of the tax, in relation to those goods currently taxed at reduced rates that are mainly consumed by high-income earners.
The difference in prices between diesel and petrol has led to a reduction in transport costs.
Tax difference in excise duty between diesel and petrol (non-professional use): The assessment concludes that the difference of €93.69 per 1,000 litres in taxation in favour of diesel HAS succeeded in favouring diesel in reducing transport costs, albeit with a negative environmental impact.
Methodologies: international benchmarking, descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Update taxation in line with environmental policy objectives
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Rejected
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2023 (Report):
Given the energy crisis resulting from the war in Ukraine, many of the planned environmental reforms are not considered appropriate at this time, such as the specific reform relating to the different taxation of diesel and petrol.
However, several measures have been adopted in line with environmental objectives:
Firstly, two new taxes have been approved and came into force on 1 January 2023: the special tax on non-reusable plastic packaging is aimed at waste prevention, and the tax on waste disposal in landfills, incineration and co-incineration is a key mechanism for advancing the circular economy and achieving the objectives of preparation for reuse and recycling of waste.
The tax on fluorinated greenhouse gases has also been modified. It not only aims to ensure effective control of fluorinated greenhouse gases, but also to simplify, as far as possible, compliance with formal obligations and, therefore, its management, both by taxpayers and by the tax authorities. In addition, an end date has been set for some exemptions currently in force because less polluting alternatives already exist and the sector must make an effort to adapt.
Update fuel taxation in line with new environmental targets. A price could be set for each kg of CO₂ and NO₂ emissions and taxed accordingly.
The reduced rates applied to SICAVs and SOCIMIs lead to a high concentration among a limited number of shareholders, casting doubt on the collective nature of the investment.
The assessment is INCONCLUSIVE when it comes to determining whether the objective of promoting collective and diversified investment is being achieved in the case of SICAVs and real estate in the case of SOCIMIs, as there is insufficient information available to ascertain whether this is new investment or comes from other financial assets. Despite this, the assessment detects a high concentration of investment in the hands of a few shareholders, despite the reinforced requirements in Spanish regulations (a minimum of 100 shareholders), which casts doubt on the collective nature of the investment.
Methodologies: international benchmarking, descriptive statistical analysis, microsimulators
- Proposals
- Organism
- Status according to Agency
-
Strengthen requirements to improve effective compliance with the collective nature of the investment
-
Ministry of Finance and Civil Service
-
Implemented
Justification of the organization
In the report published in March 2022 (Report):
Specifically, in relation to SOCIMIs, their undistributed profits are taxed at 15 per cent as dividends, thus providing a further incentive for all profits to be distributed to shareholders; and in relation to SICAVs, new objective requirements are established and the AEAT is granted the power to verify compliance.
In the subsequent update of December 2022 (Annex):
Specifically, in relation to SOCIMIs, their undistributed profits are taxed at 15 per cent as dividends, thus providing a further incentive for all profits obtained to be distributed to shareholders; and in relation to SICAVs, new objective requirements are established and the AEAT is given the power to verify compliance. With regard to SICAVs, section 4(a) of Law 27/2014 of 27 November on Corporation Tax was amended by Article 1.2 of Law 11/2021 of 9 July, on measures to prevent and combat tax fraud, transposing Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market, amending various tax rules and regulating gambling.
https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2021-11473#ap
With regard to SOCIMIs, the amendment was introduced by adding a new section 4 to Article 9 of Law 11/2009 of 26 October, regulating Listed Real Estate Investment Companies, through final provision 2.1 of Law 11/2021 of 9 July. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2021-11473#df-2
Reduced rates for SICAVs and SOCIMIs. Strengthen requirements to improve effective compliance with the collective nature of the investment under the terms set out in our regulations (e.g. setting a maximum participation limit per shareholder).
Note: Status and justification of the proposal communicated by the organization to which it is addressed